The Hitachi Travelstar Z5K finally provides high capacity in a 7mm form factor but has less-than-stellar performance. With the exception of the Z5K, which is related to the Z5K, all of the drives competing with the Z5K are two-platter mainstream 9. The top cover follows the same design scheme as other Hitachi hard drives, with a white sticker with black text covering most of the top. That said, we will let our real-world custom benchmarks tell the true story. It is not that much lower than that of a two-platter RPM drive, however.
|Date Added:||3 February 2009|
|File Size:||18.97 Mb|
|Operating Systems:||Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
First of all, there is less power consumption; the motor only has to spin one platter around. Off the bat we can see the Z5K is having inconsistent performance.
Our last set of benchmarks put the drives through a server-style load, increasing the queue depth from 1 to And last but not least, 7mm drives also weigh a tad bit less than a standard 9. So in reality, we have not seen much of an advantage to the single-platter design in this review save for the fact that it is physically thin.
Wyse Client Review. The Hitachi Travelstar Z5K is more impressive on paper than in real life. Combined with their thinness, this makes 7mm drives very attractive for use in ultraportable notebooks such as the Lenovo ThinkPad X series. Seagate Reports 1Q19 Earnings. The Z5K suffers considerably when it comes to performance, however; its htd54505 performance is middle of the pack but its write performance is downright awful. This label includes the drive and part number, shipping firmware revision, and other drive specifics.
For once we are actually looking at some normal graphs; the Z5K is not putting up a great showing and is still beat by its little brother, however. For ultraportable notebooks that bts54505 only take 7mm drives, this is as good as it gets.
The Samsung does positively awful here; it has only gotten worse.
Compared to the standard 9. The Hitachi Travelstar Z5K finally provides high capacity in a 7mm form factor but has less-than-stellar performance. For the record, the Samsung drive is doing almost as bad here, which is somewhat surprising given it did well hrs54505 the sequential benchmark.
Normal drives show an increase in performance from left to right. The trace captures the htachi read activity of each game loading from the start, as well as textures as the game progresses.
HITACHI 500GB 7.2K RPM SATA 2.5 INCH SFF 3GB/S HARD DRIVE HDD HTS72505
This drive also includes the same 8MB of cache. The bottom of the drive hitaci very clean in appearance, with all surface-mount components facing towards the bottom of the drive. Aside from its monster GB single platter design and 7mm z-height, the Z5K has little in the way of uniqueness. It is not that much lower than that of a two-platter RPM drive, however.
Hitachi Travelstar Z5K Review (HTSA7E) | – Storage Reviews
This is great news for ultraportable computer users and manufacturers alike; previously the largest capacity thin hard drive was GB. The Z5K has low power consumption for a 2. With the exception of hitachii Z5K, which is related to the Z5K, all of the drives competing with the Z5K are hitwchi mainstream 9. The Hitachi Travelstar Z5K looks like any other 2.
Additionally, the 7mm drives produce less noise on average since there are less moving parts.
Its sole selling point is at GB, it is the highest-capacity 7mm height drive available today. This test focuses on read performance to the Z5K does OK, but nothing more. In this trace we recorded MB being hts5405 to the drive and 7,MB being read. That said, we will let our real-world custom benchmarks tell the true story.
Furthermore it has a high average write latency, which hurts performance across the board. Excelero Announces NVMesh 2. That said, the Z5K is still recommendable given its GB of storage space.
It does use the new 4K Advanced Format, which increases the age-old b sector size by a factor of eight; theoretically this improves performance and reliability by a small amount though in our testing, the difference is quite small. The write performance is dreadful.