|Date Added:||14 October 2010|
|File Size:||57.50 Mb|
|Operating Systems:||Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Even at MHz the rated frequency some artifacts could be noticed. A closer look at the cooler and the thermal grease.
Even with 2xFSAA enabled the picture remains more or less the same. Both are based on the reference design. It will be comparable with the today’s MXbecause it is to replace the MX Or the Triplex’s card which has a silver-covered PCB.
Gainward GeForce4 PowerPack! Pro/X XP graphics card – GF4 MX – 64 MB Overview – CNET
Both MX based cards show identical results in all tests, that is gainwqrd we spare you from the same bars: The Second Encounter Grand Cathedral, quality mode The tests were carried out in a bit color mode. Besides, all cards follow the reference design. The overclocking of the GPU is not much beneficial either. Such construction of the cooler was used in the GeForce4 MX video card.
Gainward GeForce4 PowerPack! Pro/ TV graphics card – GF4 MX – 64 MB Overview – CNET
That is why you should carefully examine 3D performance scores, compare prices and account for the dualhead support. In the low resolution the gap between the contestants is greater on the more powerful platform. Test system and drivers Here we examine how the accelerator’s performance depends on a CPU frequency and on a platformthat is why we used two test stands: The tests were carried out in the 32bit mode. We examined today 4 production video cards based on the GeForce4 MX Test results The 2D quality is very high of all cards, and you can work comfortably at xx75 Hz and xx Hz.
We would like to thank Gainward for making this review possible.
Of course, we try to do our best to vainward this situation, but I can’t promise anything now. But first of all, take a look at the articles of already reviewed cards based on the GeForce4 MX. I just hope it won’t cost an arm and a leg. Here we can clearly see how the cheaper Radeon gives the Gainward card a serious pounding.
The MXx turned out to be one hell of an overclocker but still it was beaten by the Radeon Pro at default settings. They have a normal nView support, including TV-out. Samsung 5ns memory chips. We also would like to mention that both of these cards are available in less exclusive editions for a lower price, but then you have to miss out on the extra accessories fainward often the “Enhanced Mode”-function or at least the high clock speeds in EM featured on our two test cards.
The mode must be set in course of installation of the gainwrd. You see that it’s quite a problem for a new product to get into such a narrow price range.
Gainward GeForce4 PowerPack! Pro/600-8X XP graphics card – GF4 MX 440 – 64 MB
Instead they implemented support for 4xFSAA which we feel is way too demanding for the core. Backside, no memory modules. Concerning the Tix you should require 3D-glasses, ViVo and Firewire in order to motivate a purchase of this card.
Today we are going to take a look at 4 more cards on the GeForce4 MX which are also production models.
Gainward GeForce4 PowerPack! Pro/600 TV graphics card – GF4 MX 440 – 64 MB
In these tests we have enabled both FSAA and anisotropic filtering. The potential of the Triplex card is limited by the Samsung’s memory which is always hard to overclock. This baby has a lot more under its hood than we can see from these benchmarks.